Why Are Wedding Photographers “So” Expensive?

A wedding photographer in the USA (Nikki Wagner) has posted a very well written argument explaining why wedding photographers are “so” expensive. Her post was written in a response to a bride-to-be in the Seattle area complaining about photography charges.

The crux of her argument is that many people, perhaps the majority of people, fail to recognise that professional photographers either work for a company or are operating their own company. You may only appear to turn up at a shoot (or wedding) with “only a camera and some lenses”, but when you operate a business you have inevitable overheads. These have to be paid for, and as with any viable business it’s the clients/customers that pay.

Anyway, both complaint and response are recommended reads, whether you are a wedding or any other professional photographer:

 

Becoming Emotionally Attached To A Photograph

An East Coast Beach With Moon

An East Coast Beach With Moon

Now that I’ve redesigned my website I’ve started to go back through my (digital) photo catalogue to create some new galleries. The image to the right is one of my 300D shots from 2004 (iso 400, f11, 1/320s). This is an image I keep returning to time and again. Each time I try a little change here and a little change there. I try editing in Lightroom, Aperture and Photoshop. I try colour and black and white and, in this version, a blue & sepia split tone.

I think on any objective assessment I’m wasting my time with this image. Let’s face it, it’s not that good. It has some interesting features, such as the groyne leading out to sea, a pretty much full moon and the groyne and moon sort of balancing each other in the frame. But, in reality, there’s too much lost space in the middle, the moon is too far into the corner, the beach & sea too close to the bottom, the foreground is too dark (pushed in this version creating artefacts), the focus isn’t sharp and the overall image is flat and grainy. Oh, and I don’t even know where it was taken. It’s somewhere on England’s east coast, probably between Scarborough and Skegness.

So why do I keep going back to it, when in reality I know I’m not going to be able to turn it into a picture I’m proud of. I think it’s because, despite all it’s short comings, I do have an emotional attachment to it. In this case it has nothing to do with the trip I was on or the circumstances at the time. No, in this case it is because it was the first opportunity I had with my first digital SLR to take more than a snap. I saw the moon, saw the lead ins, tried to compose for the scene’s obvious potential and took a few shots. Could it have been done better? Yes, absolutely, although I suspect this was as good as it got for me at the time. And that’s just it, regardless of where I feel my photography is now, I’m proud of this image, warts and all, and I’m sure I’ll keep going back to it!

Buachaille Etive Mor At Night

For those of you that haven’t been, Rannoch Moor is a fantastic photography location; if the weather is on your side of course, this is western Scotland after all! In the east there are picturesque small lochs, in the centre an open expanse of “wilderness” and in the west the mountains that surround Glen Coe. At this edge of moor, towering over entrance to Glen Coe, is Buachaille Etive Mor.

Kim and I spent a few days based in Glen Coe in Feb of 2010. The images below are a small selection of night exposures taken in the shadow of the Bauchaille.

The first image was taken from a small lay-by at the side of the Glen Etive road, looking west towards the iconic face of Buachaille Etive Mor. It had snowed quite recently and the road was only really passible with a 4×4, which lucky we were driving. The image is a 10 second exposure at f10, taken after sunset at about 18:30, on a 5D Mk I. It was pretty cold that night with quite a bit of cloud and wind. Much of the evening was spent clearing ice off our lens and warming batteries up to get a few more minutes of life out of them!

Buachaille Etive Mor 1

Buachaille Etive Mor 1

The next image was taken a few days later, a little further down the Glen Etive road. There is a small bridge with a parking spot next to it. From there follow the river west for the best vantage points. It was taken on Kim’s infrared converted 20D and then converted to black & white. It’s a 342 second exposure at f10. As you can see from the foreground, we weren’t the first people there after the snow fall.

Buachaille Etive Mor 2

Buachaille Etive Mor 2

The third and final image in this set was taken at roughly the same spot as the second, but this time facing away from the Buachaille towards Sron na Creise. I used Kim’s 20D again for this 600 second f10 shot. It’s been quite harshly post processed to give it what I hope is an aged look. I’ve tried to add to this with a bit of toning.

Sron na Creise

Sron na Creise

Using an iPhone instead of a digital camera

Ars Technica have written an interesting article comparing an iPhone 4S to a small sample of digital cameras and asking the question, “can the iPhone replacement?”

Their conclusion is that it depends on the type of “photographer” you are. For many the iPhone 3S is now good enough to be their carry round point and shoot camera. Although this conclusion might be pretty obvious to many, their article is still worth reading. Check it out here