Why Are Wedding Photographers “So” Expensive?

Posted on by
Reply

A wedding photographer in the USA (Nikki Wagner) has posted a very well written argument explaining why wedding photographers are “so” expensive. Her post was written in a response to a bride-to-be in the Seattle area complaining about photography charges.

The crux of her argument is that many people, perhaps the majority of people, fail to recognise that professional photographers either work for a company or are operating their own company. You may only appear to turn up at a shoot (or wedding) with “only a camera and some lenses”, but when you operate a business you have inevitable overheads. These have to be paid for, and as with any viable business it’s the clients/customers that pay.

Anyway, both complaint and response are recommended reads, whether you are a wedding or any other professional photographer:

 

Video of a DLSR Mirror and Sensor Curtain In Action

Posted on by
Reply

The video above is a high speed capture of a DSLR’s (Canon 60D) mirror and curtain operation. So, if you’ve ever wondered what happens mechanically inside your camera when you press the shutter button check it out.

Going back to previous posts about mirrors in DSLRs (here and here), it’s interesting to see how much the mirror and curtains bounce around!

(via DIY Photography)

Becoming Emotionally Attached To A Photograph

Posted on by
1
An East Coast Beach With Moon

An East Coast Beach With Moon

Now that I’ve redesigned my website I’ve started to go back through my (digital) photo catalogue to create some new galleries. The image to the right is one of my 300D shots from 2004 (iso 400, f11, 1/320s). This is an image I keep returning to time and again. Each time I try a little change here and a little change there. I try editing in Lightroom, Aperture and Photoshop. I try colour and black and white and, in this version, a blue & sepia split tone.

I think on any objective assessment I’m wasting my time with this image. Let’s face it, it’s not that good. It has some interesting features, such as the groyne leading out to sea, a pretty much full moon and the groyne and moon sort of balancing each other in the frame. But, in reality, there’s too much lost space in the middle, the moon is too far into the corner, the beach & sea too close to the bottom, the foreground is too dark (pushed in this version creating artefacts), the focus isn’t sharp and the overall image is flat and grainy. Oh, and I don’t even know where it was taken. It’s somewhere on England’s east coast, probably between Scarborough and Skegness.

So why do I keep going back to it, when in reality I know I’m not going to be able to turn it into a picture I’m proud of. I think it’s because, despite all it’s short comings, I do have an emotional attachment to it. In this case it has nothing to do with the trip I was on or the circumstances at the time. No, in this case it is because it was the first opportunity I had with my first digital SLR to take more than a snap. I saw the moon, saw the lead ins, tried to compose for the scene’s obvious potential and took a few shots. Could it have been done better? Yes, absolutely, although I suspect this was as good as it got for me at the time. And that’s just it, regardless of where I feel my photography is now, I’m proud of this image, warts and all, and I’m sure I’ll keep going back to it!

Early HDR Photos at Holy Island

Posted on by
Reply

This is the first article in a occasional series I’ll be running looking at some of my early attempts at various photographic techniques. In September 2005 Kim & I were at one of our favourite photo locations, England’s north east coast (the bit between north Newcastle and the Scottish border).

The image below (Canon 300D, ISO100, 32mm, 1/6s, f29) is a shot of one of the old fishing boats on Holy Island with Lindisfarne Castle in the background. There are several in this harbour in various states of disrepair. I was quite close to the boat when I took the shot so even at f29 the immediate foreground and background are not in focus. These are aren’t the only technical failings either I’m sure you’ll agree!

Boat on Holy Island - Original

Boat on Holy Island - Original

But, even though it had plenty of technical issues I still quite liked the shot, so I decided to post-process it using an HDR technique, using Photomatix. I’d not set out with this intention so I didn’t have multiple actual exposures to play with so I created -1 and +1 stop virtual images in Lightroom and used these for the HDR image.

Boat on Holy Island - HDR

Boat on Holy Island - HDR

The processing has had a noticeable effect to:

  • deepened the blue (unrealistically) in the sky and bringing out some of the faint cloud structure
  • increase the local contrast to give certain areas more definition, eg on the water and around the flowers
  • increase brightness in the shadow areas of the boat and shaded grass

Looking back now I think I over-processed the image. It suffers from banding and quite serious halo effects. Also, it’s getting to the point of looking quite artificial, almost like painting. At the time though it did leave me impressed with the possibilities that HDR offered and what could be achieved with practise and more attention to detail.

 

Fujifilm X-Pro1

Posted on by
Reply

Fujifilm-X-Pro1Earlier in the week I commented on mirrors in the current crop of professional cameras and how I see them as a connection with the past rather than the future.

Well, CES 2012 is here and the mirror-less market just seems to keep getting more interesting. Much has already been written about the previously announced Sony NEX-7 (see here if you want an overview), but the big news (for me) at CES was the Fujifilm X-Pro1.

Apart from the X-Pro1 looking great, it also has some interesting features:

  • Large (APS-C) 16MP CMOS sensor
  • No low pass filter, but a sensor structure that tries to achieve the same aim. Nett effect that it will hopefully improve image quality
  • A viewfinder that you can switch between electronic and optical modes without taking it from your eye
  • Support to be provided for (Leica) M-Mount lenses

DP Review have a preview on their site, but I’ll be looking forward to knowing what the actual image quality and shutter lag is like. If they get these right at a reasonable price I think Nikon and Canon may have to up their game a little!